πŸ“„ Paper Trader β€” smart wallet convergence

Real-time monitor for the smart-wallet signal end to end: the raw live watcher feed, and the pre-registered paper strategy testing whether an outside trader can profit from it. Judged by a frozen rule: after 7 real trading days, an arm needs a positive daily gap vs its control arm on β‰₯5 of those days AND a positive absolute average EV. No mid-run parameter changes, no re-picking after the fact.

βš™ System health β€” actual activity, not just process uptime
LOADING

A process showing "online" is not proof it's working β€” a silent connection-rejection loop can run for hours without crashing. This checks real recent data instead of trusting status alone.

Smart Wallet Watcher

The raw signal everything below is built on: 439 wallets watched live (kolscan.io's real top-trader leaderboard + an internally-derived causally-profitable set, cross-referenced and deduplicated), tracked for new buys via RPC polling. Verified causal and real β€” 92.7% of graduated tokens with 2+ watched early buyers had their earliest watched buy strictly before graduation, 6.9x–16x graduation-rate lift vs baseline.

πŸ”₯ Live convergence β€” tokens with 2+ distinct watched wallets buying in the last 24h
MintDistinct walletsLast buy
β€”
πŸ“œ Recent watched-wallet buys
TimeWalletSourceMintSOL
β€”

Convergence Entry β€” the paper strategy

Does buying a token right after N distinct "smart wallets" (kolscan.io's real leaderboard + an internally causally-profitable set) converge on it, before graduation, actually work for an outside trader? The wallets' own early positioning was independently verified β€” 92.7% causal ordering, 6.9x–16x graduation-rate lift β€” this tests whether that translates into a fillable, profitable entry.

LOADING
Arm leaderboard β€” gap vs control
ArmTradesWin rateAvg P&LGap vs control Gap days (+/judged)Qualifies
β€”
πŸ“ˆ Cumulative P&L β€” by arm
conv2 conv3 conv5 control
πŸ“œ Recent convergence-entry trades
TimeSymbolArm ExitHoldP&L SOL
no trades yet